[Samba] Broken Dependencies?

Dirk Laurenz samba at laurenz.ws
Tue May 10 12:32:07 UTC 2022


If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van Belle via
> samba
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36
> An: samba at lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> 
> Hai Dirk,
> 
> Can you give me a output of both servers.
> dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient "
> 
> I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this in
newer
> version.
> 
> 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1
> 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1
> 
> S is higher that L
> 
> Quick fix, remove samba and install it again..
> Just don’t use --autoremove --purge options.
> All data and configs  will stay as is..
> 
> The new format will be  for the 4.16 line.
> 
> samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1	< not sure if i will build these.
> Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported on
buster.
> 
> samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1
> samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1	< not sure if i will build these,
> same reason as above but for focal.
> samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1
> 
> The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+
> 
> if you want sooner to 4.16.1
> https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye-
> backports&arch=any&searcho
> n=names&keywords=samba
> Micheal (new samba debian maintainer)  provided already a backport.
> 
> so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, not
> much anymore.
> 
> last changelog.
> samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * Rebuild from bullseye-backports.
>     Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends
>   * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter
>   * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend
>     This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend.
>     Info
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend
> 
>  -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl>  Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16 +0200
> 
> im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will be
online
> this week.
> At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now.
> 
> PS. Small side note,
> just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba does
not
> support SSSD yet.
> fix soon, see debian bug #1010801
> 
> 
> Greetz,
> 
> Louis
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39
> > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all
sources.list
> to
> > bullseye.
> >
> >
> >
> > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list:
> >
> >
> >
> > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list
> >
> > # AptVanBelle repo for samba.
> >
> > #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main
> >
> > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main
> >
> >
> >
> > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading.
> > When I now want to reinstall I get this.
> >
> >
> >
> > root at dc02:~# aptitude update
> >
> > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease
> >
> > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease
> >
> > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease
> >
> > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease
> >
> > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest bullseye
> > InRelease
> >
> > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge InRelease
> >
> > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge Release
> >
> >
> >
> > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade
> >
> > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig
> >
> > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig
> >
> > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig
> >
> > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig
> >
> > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht
> aktualisiert.
> >
> > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba
> >
> > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert:
> >
> >   acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} python3-
> > cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a} python3-
> > pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b}
> >
> >   samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a}
> >
> > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zusätzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und
0
> nicht
> > aktualisiert.
> >
> > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven müssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach dem
> > Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zusätzlich belegt sein.
> >
> > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abhängigkeiten:
> >
> > samba : Hängt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed
> >
> >          Hängt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht installationsfähig
> >
> >          Hängt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist
> aber
> > nicht installationsfähig
> >
> >          Hängt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual
package
> and is not
> > provided by any available package
> >
> >
> >
> >          Hängt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist aber
> nicht
> > installationsfähig
> >
> >
> >
> > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the bullseye
> > repo (samba at the moment same version)
> >
> >
> >
> >      Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version:
> >
> > 1)     samba [Nicht installiert]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba




More information about the samba mailing list