[Samba] Benefits of CTDB in a Active/Active cluster managed by Pacemaker
slow at samba.org
Wed Mar 23 18:11:39 UTC 2022
On 3/23/22 18:46, Alexx Bull via samba wrote:
> I’m considering a situation where I’ll have nodes providing SMB exports in
> an Active/Active cluster managed by Pacemaker. Because my setup may require
> a configuration not (easily) supported by CTDB, I’m considering excluding
> it. In this event, I wanted to know if there are any critical issues (i.e:
> data inconsistency) that CTDB solves that should make it a requirement for
> my setup or if CTDB is more like a bonus?
if data consistency is just a bonus in this setup, then CTDB is not needed.
Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/
SerNet Samba Team Lead https://sernet.de/en/team-samba
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the samba