[Samba] Benefits of CTDB in a Active/Active cluster managed by Pacemaker

[Ralph Boehme]

Hello Alex,

On 3/23/22 18:46, Alexx Bull via samba wrote:
> I’m considering a situation where I’ll have nodes providing SMB exports in
> an Active/Active cluster managed by Pacemaker. Because my setup may require
> a configuration not (easily) supported by CTDB, I’m considering excluding
> it. In this event, I wanted to know if there are any critical issues (i.e:
> data inconsistency) that CTDB solves that should make it a requirement for
> my setup or if CTDB is more like a bonus?

if data consistency is just a bonus in this setup, then CTDB is not needed.

-slow

-- 
Ralph Boehme, Samba Team                 https://samba.org/
SerNet Samba Team Lead      https://sernet.de/en/team-samba
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20220323/bf45a732/OpenPGP_signature.sig>