[Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)

[L. van Belle]

Hai Kees,

No, this is correct. You need to have the backports repo enable. 
the version I currenlty build used backports for the build depends. 

I might/will change this, I need to workout a better pinning setup, al
l needed packages for samba must get pin : 500  to make the installs more
easy. 

An other option is, I sync the backported packages to my own repo and that
also
makes the installs more easy again.  

If someone knows a setup that an sync "per package", im all ears. 

Greetz, 

Louis





> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Namens Kees van Vloten via
> samba
> Verzonden: donderdag 16 juni 2022 21:11
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online
> (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)
> 
> Hi Louis,
> 
> I am trying to upgrade to 4.16.2 with your repo (and without backports),
the
> upgrade fails due to missing dependencies, the onces you mention below.
> Did you forget to add them to your repo or is there a good reason why it
did
> not happen?
> 
> - Kees
> 
> Op 13-05-2022 om 08:48 schreef L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> > You have to Enable bullseye backports repo also.
> > That will provide the needed depends for the samba pakcages.
> >
> > hmm, I see now its not handy to keep these depends in bullseye-
> backports.
> > I'll do the depends also today and upload these to my repo.
> > missing on my repo are talloc tdb and ldb packages.
> >
> >
> > Greetz,
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >> Van: samba Namens spindles seven via samba
> >> Verzonden: donderdag 12 mei 2022 18:06
> >> Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org>
> >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online
> >> (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)
> >>
> >> On 12 May 2022 15:20 L. van Belle wrote:
> >>> Hai,
> >>>
> >>> As mentioned and later then normal.. Finaly there..
> >>> Samba 4.16.1 is on my repo for debian Bullseye.
> >>> You have choice these days, since the packages are now up2date
> >>>
> >> Hi Louis,
> >> Have tried to update one of my servers from samba version 4.14.7 to
> >> 4.16.1 using your repo and I get the response that it will remove all
the
> samba
> >> modules rather than upgrading them.   Have tried it on two different
> boxes,
> >> both with the same result:
> >>
> >> roy at moggy:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove Reading package
> >> lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state
> information...
> >> Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be
> REMOVED:
> >>    libnss-winbind libpam-winbind libyaml-0-2 python3-dnspython python3-
> gpg
> >>    python3-markdown python3-pygments python3-requests-toolbelt
> >> python3-samba
> >>    python3-tdb python3-yaml samba samba-common samba-common-bin
> >> tdb-tools
> >>    winbind
> >> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >>    linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64
> >> The following packages will be upgraded:
> >>    linux-image-amd64
> >> 1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 16 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> >> Need to get 53.8 MB of archives.
> >> After this operation, 251 MB of additional disk space will be used.
> >> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
> >> Abort.
> >>
> >> All I did was to edit the van-belle.list file and run the apt-get
update and
> apt-
> >> get dist-upgrade commands.    I suspect a dependency is missing, but
> what?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Roy Eastwood
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> >
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba