[Samba] Error in samba-tool drs updateness
Bruno Guerreiro
bruno.guerreiro at ine.pt
Mon Jul 18 09:37:36 UTC 2022
Hi Douglas,
Thanks for the help, and sorry for the delay. I've been away.
I've applied the patch, and the result is this:
Missing dn CN=DC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
Missing dn CN=DC02,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
Missing dn CN=DC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
...
Missing dn CN=DC10,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
This DC11 is a Win2008R2 DC
BRGDS,
Bruno Guerreiro
From: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> on behalf of Douglas Bagnall via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 1:26 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: [Samba] Error in samba-tool drs updateness
EMAIL EXTERNO À ORGANIZAÇÃO
A abertura de mensagens de origem e/ou conteúdo duvidoso poderá comprometer a sua privacidade e a segurança dos dados a que acede. Não aceda a ligações (links), nem abra anexos de remetentes desconhecidos. Nunca forneça dados pessoais associados à sua conta.
hi Bruno,
If you apply the attached patch to samba/uptodateness.py, wherever that
might be on your system, it might tell you which DC is confused. (no
recompiling should be necessary).
On 7/07/22 06:49, Bruno Guerreiro via samba wrote:
> Hi Rowland.
> Here's the full error:
>
> root at DC01:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness
From a `| sort | uniq -c`, it looks like 5 repetitions of 10 DCs, like this:
5 Missing dn CN=DC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,
5 Missing dn CN=DC02,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,
5 Missing dn CN=DC03,CN=Servers,CN=Porto,
5 Missing dn CN=DC04,CN=Servers,CN=Coimbra,
5 Missing dn CN=DC05,CN=Servers,CN=Evora,
5 Missing dn CN=DC06,CN=Servers,CN=Faro,
5 Missing dn CN=DC07,CN=Servers,CN=Funchal,
5 Missing dn CN=DC08,CN=Servers,CN=Lisboa,
5 Missing dn CN=DC09,CN=Servers,CN=Lisboa,
5 Missing dn CN=DC10,CN=Servers,CN=Angra,
5 repetitions because 5 partitions. Is there an 11th DC? Or one that was
not removed completely and/or not smoothly upgraded?
> DOMAIN maximum: 207 median: 18.0 failure: 10
> CONFIGURATION maximum: 468 median: 29.0 failure: 10
> SCHEMA maximum: 318 median: 27.0 failure: 10
> DNSDOMAIN maximum: 56 median: 3.0 failure: 10
> DNSFOREST maximum: 378 median: 36.0 failure: 10
I think I'd expect the max/median numbers to be lower here, unless the
network is very busy at the time -- or, of course, a DC that is failing to
replicate.
cheers,
Douglas
Confidencialidade: Esta mensagem (e eventuais ficheiros anexos) é destinada exclusivamente às pessoas nela indicadas e tem natureza confidencial. Se receber esta mensagem por engano, por favor contacte o remetente e elimine a mensagem e ficheiros, sem tomar conhecimento do respectivo conteudo e sem reproduzi-la ou divulgá-la. Confidentiality Warning: This e-mail message (and any attached files) is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. lf you are not the intended recipient of this message please notify the sender and delete and destroy all copies immediately.
More information about the samba
mailing list