[Samba] SPNEGO login failed: The type of a token object is inappropriate for its attempted use. (centos 8 upgrade regression)

Rowland Penny rpenny at samba.org
Mon Feb 14 16:37:55 UTC 2022


On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 17:22 +0100, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> 
> On 12/23/21 22:15, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote:
> > On 12/23/21 1:02 PM, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote:
> > > Hello everybody,
> > > 
> > > I had to downgrade samba on all my centos 8 systems this morning
> > > after 
> > > an upgrade made caused kerberos logins to stop working.
> > > 
> > > yum downgrade samba -y
> > > 
> > > it also downgraded sssd packages but only downgrading sssd did
> > > not work.
> > > 
> > > How do I debug this further and does anyone encountered the same 
> > > problem and found a solution?
> > > 
> > > Testing with the bellow command showed me:
> > > 
> > > LC_ALL=C smbclient -d 10 -k -L samba01.organization.lan
> > > 
> > > Starting GENSEC mechanism spnego
> > > Starting GENSEC submechanism gse_krb5
> > > gensec_update_send: gse_krb5[0x5590f7bb38e0]: subreq:
> > > 0x5590f7baa280
> > > gensec_update_send: spnego[0x5590f7bad880]: subreq:
> > > 0x5590f7bb2410
> > > gensec_update_done: gse_krb5[0x5590f7bb38e0]: 
> > > NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 
> > > tevent_req[0x5590f7baa280/../../source3/librpc/crypto/gse.c:848]:
> > >  
> > > state[2] error[0 (0x0)]  state[struct gensec_gse_update_state 
> > > (0x5590f7baa430)] timer[(nil)] 
> > > finish[../../source3/librpc/crypto/gse.c:859]
> > > gensec_update_done: spnego[0x5590f7bad880]: 
> > > NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED 
> > > tevent_req[0x5590f7bb2410/../../auth/gensec/spnego.c:1631]:
> > > state[2] 
> > > error[0 (0x0)]  state[struct gensec_spnego_update_state 
> > > (0x5590f7bb25c0)] timer[(nil)]
> > > finish[../../auth/gensec/spnego.c:2116]
> > > SPNEGO login failed: The type of a token object is inappropriate
> > > for 
> > > its attempted use.
> > > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_TOKEN_TYPE
> > 
> > I went through the thread of Alex subject: [Samba] Authentication
> > issue 
> > after updating samba on CentOS 7 (from yum)
> > 
> > I updated the samba package to samba-4.14.5-7.el8_5.x86_64 and the 
> > problem came back.
> > 
> > I then tried the adding the following options:
> > local nt token from nss:DOMAIN = no
> > and
> > local nt token from nss:* = no
> > but they did not work.
> > 
> > This is my global config:
> > 
> > [global]
> >      dedicated keytab file = FILE:/etc/samba/samba.keytab
> >      disable spoolss = Yes
> >      kerberos method = dedicated keytab
> >      load printers = No
> >      log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> >      printcap name = /dev/null
> >      realm = DOMAIN.LAN
> >      security = USER
> >      winbind refresh tickets = Yes
> >      winbind use default domain = Yes
> >      workgroup = DOMAIN
> >      local nt token from nss:domain = no
> >      idmap config * : backend = tdb
> >      map acl inherit = Yes
> >      printing = bsd
> >      vfs objects = acl_xattr
> > 
> > @Alex did you contact Andreas Schneider the RH maintainer?
> > 
> > It can also be n issue related in one of the bellow packages as
> > they 
> > also got downgraded with samba
> > 
> > # yum downgrade samba -y
> > ....
> > Downloading Packages:
> > (1/46): ipa-client-4.9.6-6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.x86_64.rpm
> > (2/46): ipa-client-common-4.9.6-
> > 6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.noarch.rpm
> > (3/46): ipa-common-4.9.6-6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.noarch.rpm
> > (4/46): ipa-server-4.9.6-6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.x86_64.rpm
> > (5/46): ipa-server-trust-ad-4.9.6-
> > 6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.x86_64.rpm
> > (6/46): python3-ipaclient-4.9.6-
> > 6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.noarch.rpm
> > (7/46): python3-ipalib-4.9.6-
> > 6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.noarch.rpm
> > (8/46): ipa-server-common-4.9.6-
> > 6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.noarch.rpm
> > (9/46): python3-ipaserver-4.9.6-
> > 6.module_el8.5.0+948+b8187ba6.noarch.rpm
> > (10/46): libsss_autofs-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (11/46): libipa_hbac-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (12/46): libsmbclient-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (13/46): libsss_idmap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (14/46): libsss_nss_idmap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (15/46): libsss_simpleifp-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (16/46): libsss_sudo-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (17/46): libsss_certmap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (18/46): libwbclient-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (19/46): python3-libsss_nss_idmap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (20/46): python3-libipa_hbac-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (21/46): python3-sss-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (22/46): python3-sssdconfig-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.noarch.rpm
> > (23/46): samba-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (24/46): samba-client-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (25/46): samba-common-4.14.5-2.el8.noarch.rpm
> > (26/46): samba-common-libs-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (27/46): python3-samba-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (28/46): samba-libs-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (29/46): samba-common-tools-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (30/46): samba-winbind-modules-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (31/46): samba-winbind-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (32/46): sssd-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (33/46): samba-client-libs-4.14.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > (34/46): sssd-ad-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (35/46): sssd-client-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (36/46): sssd-common-pac-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (37/46): sssd-dbus-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (38/46): sssd-ipa-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (39/46): sssd-common-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (40/46): sssd-krb5-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (41/46): sssd-krb5-common-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (42/46): sssd-ldap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (43/46): sssd-proxy-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (44/46): sssd-winbind-idmap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (45/46): sssd-tools-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> > (46/46): sssd-nfs-idmap-2.5.2-2.el8_5.1.x86_64.rpm
> 
> I wanted to ask if anyone found a solution to kerberos auth breaking 
> with samba on centos / centos stream 8.

Have you considered that this may be a redhat problem, seeing as three
quarters of the packages are redhat ones ? This may be an interaction
between the redhat packages and the Samba ones are working correctly.

Rowland





More information about the samba mailing list