Rowland Penny rpenny at samba.org
Tue Jul 6 15:37:38 UTC 2021

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 17:10 +0200, Bastian Sebode via samba wrote:
> Hello Andrew, hello Rowland and hello list,
> thanks again very much for the clarification of the user ID mapping
> process.
> On Thursday I will change the configuration to an own mapping range
> for 
> the CUSTOMER domain as proposed.
> To be honest I still don't understand why this change should fix my 
> problem with the "NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND" and 
> "NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND". Though the mappings in the
> current 
> configuration are not deterministic, it should still always be the
> same 
> in the mapping file while not altered and Samba is running, or not?

I am not saying this will cure your problem, but it is a step in the
right direction, your original smb.conf was just wrong.

> I will change the IDs on Thursday and will report on Friday if the 
> problems has been resolved through this or not.
> As you mentioned the documentation: Maybe it is possible to log
> which 
> "OBJECT_PATH"/"OBJECT_NAME" was not found. The would probably clarify
> a lot.

Try raising the log level in smb.conf, start at '3' and work your way
up, but beware, the higher the number, the more your logs will be


More information about the samba mailing list