[Samba] nt acl support
jra at samba.org
Thu Jun 18 17:50:41 UTC 2020
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 04:31:19PM +0200, ERIC PEYREMORTE via samba wrote:
> Is there any drawbacks of using "nt acl support = No" on a share ? I mean breaking applications ?
> I do not want users to change permissions from Windows.
> With nt acl support = No, icacls returns no permissions Users have Full Control.
> It's fine for me that Security tab disappears.
> Users can access Linux shell, and i only want users to modify permissions from Linux.
> I'm using samba as a file server on a legacy domain samba3 / ldap (with same users and password as my new AD domain), until a full migration.
Some Windows apps won't work without ACL support.
You'll have to try on a case-by-case basis to see
if this works for you.
More information about the samba