[Samba] auto_private_groups analogue?
chriscox at endlessnow.com
Fri Feb 28 17:18:24 UTC 2020
What I'm offering is a solution.
Again, what I proposed is a functional workaround. It's actually pretty natural
and obvious when you get right down to it.
On 2/28/20 8:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 28/02/2020 13:24, chriscox--- via samba wrote:
>> Manually. Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------
>> Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020
>> 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups
>> analogue?On 28/02/2020 00:00, Christopher Cox via samba wrote:
>>> Maybe a workaround? We use winbind and default domain. Therefore
>>> there are two records from getent if there's a local user with the
>>> same name (and different uid). However, I just did a test creating a
>>> local user with the uid from winbind and created the associated
>>> group. So, for my cjcox test user when logged into a shell I get:
>>> $ id
>>> uid=16777219(cjcox) gid=16777219(cjcox)
>>> groups=16777219(cjcox),16777217(BUILTIN\users), etc...
>>> and I only get one entry back from gentent passwd.
>> It sounds like you have a borked setup and I would love to know how you
>> are creating a user or group with the same name as an existing one.
>> Whenever I try, it fails with something like
>> 'error, user exists'.
> I wouldn't send emails from that phone if I were you, I had to read it three
> times before I spotted your reply ;-)
> That is a stupid way to add users or groups, I cannot recommend using it.
More information about the samba