[Samba] Samba 4.11.0RC1 replication with Windows2012R2 ?

Tim Beale timbeale at catalyst.net.nz
Mon Jul 29 21:36:48 UTC 2019

FYI, we've added a wiki page that explains this difference between
functional level and schema level in a bit more detail.

I've got a patch to link to the wiki page from the WHATSNEW (currently
pending review/delivery).

The other thing to note is there's a bug joining Windows on 4.10 and
4.11rc1. The fix is pending delivery, so this should be fixed in a
subsequent rc build.

On 30/07/19 4:43 AM, Luc Lalonde via samba wrote:
> Ahh ok, thanks for the clarification!   I'll go to bed less ignorant
> tonight ;-)
> On 2019-07-29 12:07 p.m., Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>> On 29/07/2019 16:41, Luc Lalonde wrote:
>>> The first sentence says that default schema has changed from 2008R2
>>> (schema 47) to 2012R2 (schema 69).
>>> This does not mean that we're now at Windows 2012R2 functional level by
>>> default?   I must be missing something...
>> Schema version != function level ;-)
>> For instance, Samba, as you say, uses schema 47 which could be
>> function level 2008R2, but you can set it to be 2003 (not that you
>> would want to)
>> Rowland

More information about the samba mailing list