[Samba] 32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
saurabhnanda at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 06:05:35 UTC 2019
> I've looked at the trace but didn't find anything out of the
> ordinary. The "STATUS_NO_MORE_FILES" is erroneously taken into account
> in the stats because your kernel is missing this patch:
Thank you for looking into this, Aurélien. Unfortunately, I've already
configured NFS and it is working slightly better than Samba, for now. It
takes anywhere from 30 - 40 minutes for the same operation, as against
60-70 minutes that Samba takes.
I'm guessing traversing lots of files and directories is just not what
network filesystems are meant for.
More information about the samba