[Samba] CTDB potential locking issue
Micha Ballmann
ballmann at uni-landau.de
Tue Sep 18 19:15:33 UTC 2018
How did you mount your cephfs filesystem?
Am 18. September 2018 20:34:25 MESZ schrieb David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
>Hi All
>
>I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7,
>Samba
>4.7.1
>
>The node network is a direct 1Gb link
>
>Storage is Cephfs
>
>ctdb status is OK
>
>It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the
>following
>in my log.smbd:
>
>[2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0]
>> ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal)
>> db_ctdb_fetch_locked for /var/lib/ctdb/locking.tdb.1 key
>> DE0726567AF1EAFD4A741403000100000000000000000000, chain 3642 needed
>16
>> attempts, 315 milliseconds, chainlock: 78.340000 ms, CTDB 236.511000
>ms
>> [2018/09/18 19:16:15.958368, 0]
>> ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal)
>> db_ctdb_fetch_locked for /var/lib/ctdb/locking.tdb.1 key
>> DE0726567AF1EAFD4A741403000100000000000000000000, chain 3642 needed
>15
>> attempts, 297 milliseconds, chainlock: 58.532000 ms, CTDB 239.124000
>ms
>> [2018/09/18 19:16:18.139443, 0]
>> ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal)
>> db_ctdb_fetch_locked for /var/lib/ctdb/locking.tdb.1 key
>> DE0726567AF1EAFD4A741403000100000000000000000000, chain 3642 needed
>11
>> attempts, 128 milliseconds, chainlock: 27.141000 ms, CTDB 101.450000
>ms
>>
>
>Can someone advise what this means and if it's something to be
>concerned
>about?
>
>I've worked with ctdb set-ups in the past and don't recall seeing these
>messages but that could just be because verbosity is higher with this
>version.
>
>It's a new implementation, I've not had any performance or locking
>issues
>reported and smbstatus -L looks normal although have noticed load
>average
>on servers are a little higher than expected
>
>Here is my sanitized smb.comf and ctdbd.conf:
>
>[global]
> workgroup = DOMAIN
> realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
> security = ADS
> clustering = yes
> idmap config * : range = 16777216-33554431
> template shell = /bin/false
> kerberos method = secrets only
> winbind use default domain = True
> netbios name = HOSTNAME
> log level = 1
> create krb5 conf = yes
> encrypt passwords = yes
> unix extensions = No
> min protocol = smb2
> max protocol = smb2
> strict allocate = yes
> follow symlinks = yes
> allow insecure wide links = yes
> idmap config DOMAIN : backend = ad
> idmap config DOMAIN : range = 700-199999
> idmap config DOMAIN : schema_mode = rfc2307
> idmap config DOMAIN : unix_nss_info = yes
> idmap config DOMAIN:unix_primary_group = yes
> winbind enum users = yes
> winbind enum groups = yes
> winbind normalize names = no
> winbind reconnect delay = 2
> winbind cache time = 900
> name resolve order = host
> disable netbios = yes
> fileid:algorithm = fsid
> vfs objects = fileid
> usershare allow guests = yes
> map to guest = Bad User
> hide dot files = Yes
> hide files = /$*/
> hide special files = yes
> strict sync = No
>
>/etc/ctdb/ctdbd.conf:
>
> CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses
> CTDB_MANAGES_SAMBA=yes
> CTDB_SAMBA_SKIP_SHARE_CHECK=yes
> CTDB_MANAGES_WINBIND=yes
> CTDB_MANAGES_NFS=yes
> CTDB_NFS_CALLOUT=/etc/ctdb/nfs-ganesha-callout
> CTDB_NFS_CHECKS_DIR=/etc/ctdb/nfs-checks-ganesha.d
> CTDB_NFS_SKIP_SHARE_CHECK=yes
> CTDB_DEBUGLEVEL=NOTICE
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
More information about the samba
mailing list