[Samba] "missing security tab" and related ACL issues
Rowland Penny
rpenny at samba.org
Fri Sep 7 10:45:49 UTC 2018
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:22:36 +0200
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> At a customer server (gentoo linux, so far only Samba version 4.7.7)
> we tried to use Windows ACLs and failed:
>
> no security tab in Windows ... for local C: yes, not on samba shares
>
> Yes, I followed
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
>
> and have the vfs module enabled etc
>
> -
>
> Now I consider that the kernel doesn't have the necessary flags set.
>
> I get
>
> # getfattr -n security.NTACL -d /mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT
> /mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT: security.NTACL: Operation not supported
>
> but
>
> # getfacl /mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT
> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
> # file: mnt/MSA2040/smb/IT
> # owner: ittner
> # group: dom�nen-benutzer
> user::rwx
> group::rwx
> other::r-x
>
> -
>
> From the old kernel config I see these flags unset:
>
> # CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
> # CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY is not set
>
> So I prepared a new kernel with these 2 flags enabled and will reboot
> at 2:30pm ... We'll see!
>
> Any other issues I might miss here?
>
>
Apart from the fact getattr works on an EA and getfacl works on
extended ACL's i.e. different things ? ;-)
Stop me if I am wrong, but isn't 'benutzer' German for 'users' ?
What is the the German for 'admins' ?
Rowland
More information about the samba
mailing list