[Samba] chrony configuration for secondary samba DC

[Alexei Rozenvaser]

Can't argue with that.
100% logical standpoint.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 7:36 PM Reindl Harald via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 03.06.2018 um 17:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:45:37 +0300
> > Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> How you so sure about it?
> >> Even at https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/samba chrony mentioned as
> >> suggested related package
> >> .
> >
> > Ubuntu can recommend what they like, but Samba only recommends and
> > supports ntpd.
>
> no, you think so, you even maybe right but all you do in this thread is
> stating personal opinions
>
> NTP is defined in IETF RFC's and a decadesa old protocol and unless you
> can point out a technical reason or even a protocol violation of
> whatever implementation or that samba relies on a protocol violation
> other implementations don't support samba supports NTP as a prococol and
> not a specific implementation
>
> just because you didn't try something don't say anything about technical
> supported - NTP is not a C library with a API samba is linked against
> and franly given that most distributions switching away from ntp.org
> it's time to even *officailyl support* chrony which is the default
> implementation in the Redhat world too, not only Ubuntu
>
> > You can use whatever you like, but you cannot get support here for
> > chrony.
>
> this is still a *users* list
>
> > Rowland Penny: Samba team member
> don't make personal options a technical fact
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba



-- 
Alexei Rozenvaser