[Samba] Need advice on upgrading from 4.3.11 to 4.8.3
taner76 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 17 06:44:15 UTC 2018
On 16.07.2018 11:48, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote:
> On 15/07/2018 21:27, Taner Tas via samba wrote:
>> We have a Samba AD DC service running on Ubuntu 16.0.4 with Samba
>> We are planning to upgrade it to a recent version, probably 4.8.3.
> Yes, Penny is spot on.
> I have recently performed a similar task in a production environment.
> 1. Test the whole procedure at home with VMs, where I took a copy of
> the current VM, then created a new 4.8.x VM and followed through the
> join and demote, then tested logging on, RSAT and various Domain
> related tasks... lots of interesting things cropped up which I dealt
> with and redid it all AGAIN :)
> 2. Out of office hours, BACKUP the current VM just before you do it.
> 3. Create new VM with stable 4.8.x, join, check replication and
> TRANSFER roles.
> 4. Make sure you can logon clients, print, browse internet, etc. Check
> that any Windows Servers have the correct DNS and using RSAT tools
> check that both DCs are replicating, etc.
> 5. Create another same new VM with 4.8.x and join to Domain. Check
> replication to all 3.
> 6. POWER OFF the old VM and then do some more testing without it ON.
> 7. If you ready, start up the old VM and then demote it... check all
> has gone using RSAT tools (I had to manually remove _loads_ in DNS
> 8. POWER OFF THE OLD VM, TURN OFF AUTOSTART (or check you have a
> backup then DELETE it from your VM environment)
> 9. More checks and then BACKUP both new DCs then come in early on
> Monday morning to be sure :)
> Penny, does all that sound OK?
Have you any test procedure rather than basic operations (account setup
etc) that you are following
regularly? After proper dhcpd.conf setup and dns cleanup, new logons
will not aware any server side
update except clients remain in sleep mode at night right?
Even If I keep dns service running on demoted DC's, after dns record
clean-up, those clients
woke up from sleep (or didn't shut down at all) would be seek previous
Is there a proven solution for such conditions?
More information about the samba