[Samba] High CPU While Loading RSAT Active Directory Users and Computers
Dale Renton
drenton at gmail.com
Fri Nov 17 14:46:14 UTC 2017
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out a problem with our AD DC with the FSMO roles, name
DC1. When starting the Windows RSAT Active Directory Users and Computers
program against DC1 it takes about 90 seconds to load. A samba process on
the server is at 100% CPU while waiting for it to load. Once loaded the
CPU goes back to normal. When connecting the Active Directory Users and
Computers program against DC2 though it loads in a couple of seconds. DC1
and DC2 are on two different identical physical servers with the same
config. When running strace on the 100% CPU process, most of the time is
spent on the fcntl syscall.
CentOS 7
Samba 4.5.10
samba-tool dbcheck returns 0 errors
samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs returns 0 errors
samba-tool drs showrepl returns 0 failures
smb.conf :
[global]
netbios name = DC1
realm = AD.EXAMPLE.COM
server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl,
winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
workgroup = EXAMPLEAD
server role = active directory domain controller
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
# used for OpenLDAP sync
password hash gpg key ids = ...........
# temporary
ntlm auth = yes
[netlogon]
path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ad.example.com/scripts
read only = No
[sysvol]
path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
read only = No
root preexec = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/
ad.example.com/scripts/logonscript.py %U %I %a
strace -c -p 2053 returns :
strace: Process 2053 attached
strace: Process 2053 detached
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
96.49 0.169676 0 964777 13 fcntl
1.74 0.003061 10 305 epoll_wait
0.74 0.001302 0 10672 read
............
strace -p2053 returns hundreds of thousands of lines like this :
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=1652100,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11368,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11368,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=1652100,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11368,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11372,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=17976160,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11372,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11372,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=17976160,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=2147760,
l_len=1}) = 0
fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11372,
l_len=1}) = 0
................
Any thoughts ?
Thanks,
Dale
More information about the samba
mailing list