[Samba] Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64

fodrek.p at pzvar.sk fodrek.p at pzvar.sk
Fri Nov 10 13:43:55 UTC 2017


Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 11:52:26 CET Rowland Penny via samba napísali:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:38:00 +0100
>
> wrote:
> > Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 11:07:13 CET Rowland Penny via samba
> >
> > napísali:
> > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:39:10 +0100
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > You should have said that in the first place, I thought it was a
> > > > > CIFS problem 
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please post your smb.conf
> > > >
> > > > it is set by yast and its only content is as follows. It may be
> > > > problem in kerberos method as I think
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [global]
> > >
> > > Is that it ?
> > > Just '[global]' ????
> >
> > Not realy, something cahnged text twice, It is included in text as
> > weel as in attachement
> >
> > [global]
> >
> > security = ADS        workgroup = 1ZVARACSKA        log file
> >
> > = /var/log/samba/%m.log kerberos method = system keytab        client
> > signing = yes        client use spnego = yes idmap gid =
> > 10000-20000        idmap uid = 10000-20000        usershare allow

> >
> > > I think you should try reading this:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member
> > >
> > > I would also suggest you upgrade your 2003 server, it is EOL.
> > >
> > > Also, please don't send replies just to me, send them to the list.
> > >
> > > Rowland
>
> Firstly, do you think you could find another email client ?
>

Maybe it was misconfigurtation of kmail/kontact of myselfg. It may now work ok.



> Yast appears to be borked, it is producing an extremely old style
> smb.conf, can I suggest you read this:

I was newer 



> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member

Thank you. It looks like very similar to  way that I have used for stnadrad 
ldap  authentification for login, ssh and subversion server in the past.


Kind regards
Peter

>
> You said in another post that the windows server is maintained by a
> third party, I beg to differ, it is being mis-maintained by a third
> party. If it was being maintained, it would have been upgraded by now,
> it went EOL 2 years ago.
>
> Rowland




More information about the samba mailing list