[Samba] Samba AD has empty Default GPOs

Philippe Clérié pclerie at gmail.com
Tue May 30 12:07:34 UTC 2017


Well thanks for letting me know I was chasing ghosts! :-)

I only realized last night that these policies are not even required.

Thanks

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 May 2017 18:44:41 -0400
> Philippe Clérié via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > What about DC as primary domain controller? No Windows servers. Only
> > clients.
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:01:56 -0400
> > > Philippe Clérié via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it normal for a fresh installation of Samba to have empty
> > > > Default Domain Controllers Policy and Default Domain Policy?
> > > >
> > > > I've done 5 DC using Samba and the last three always had empty
> > > > default gpos.
> > > >
> > > > (Using Ubuntu 16.04 and Samba 4.3,11)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > >
> > > If you mean DCs that you join to a domain, then yes, you need to
> > > sync sysvol to the new DCs
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Sorry, my misunderstanding. I thought you were referring to when you
> joined another DC to an existing domain, in which case my reply was
> valid.
>
> If you mean are the default GPOs always empty on a provisioned domain,
> then again the answer is yes, and you should not alter them. If you
> need GPOs, then add new ones.
>
> Rowland
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>



-- 
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
<Anonymous>


More information about the samba mailing list