[Samba] administrative share = yes

[Stefan Kania]

Am 18.07.17 um 20:32 schrieb Luke Barone via samba:
> Why not just give the name "[admin-share$]? This is what I do, and it
> appears hidden when users browse the file server.
I know that, but I would like to test the parameter. It must be good for
anything ;-)

> 
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Stefan Kania via samba <
> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> has anyone used this parameter in smb.conf an get ist worked:
>> ---------------
>> [admin-share]
>>         path = /admin-share
>>         browsable = no
>>         read only = no
>>         administrative share = yes
>> ---------------
>> It should create a share like the D$ shares in windows. But when I use:
>> "administrative share = yes
>> ---------------
>> and lock in as the domainadmin, I can't connect to the share. any hint?
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>


-- 
Stefan Kania
Landweg 13
25693 St. Michaelisdonn


Signieren jeder E-Mail hilft Spam zu reduzieren. Signieren Sie ihre
E-Mail. Weiter Informationen unter http://www.gnupg.org

Mein Schlüssel liegt auf

hkp://subkeys.pgp.net


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20170718/781a2995/signature.sig>