[Samba] extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian

Emmanuel Florac eflorac at intellique.com
Tue Aug 29 11:47:27 UTC 2017


Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:45:16 +0200
Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:

> Am 28.08.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> > These are your non-default lines:
> > 
> >       server signing = mandatory  
> 
> and i bet that one has the major performance impact
> __________________________
> 
> quote from microsoft:
> 
> Using SMB packet signing can degrade performance up to 15 percent on 
> file service transactions.
> 
> Depending on your network and your storage system implementation, the 
> performance impact might be quite different. You may have to test in
> you own environment to get an accurate statistics.
> 

Interesting. It's quite possible for the Samba implementation to be much
slower than Microsoft's. However of course if this turns on encryption
it can understandably hamper performance dramatically on fast networks.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac at intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Signature digitale OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20170829/fcf1cb4f/attachment.sig>


More information about the samba mailing list