[Samba] extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
Emmanuel Florac
eflorac at intellique.com
Tue Aug 29 11:47:27 UTC 2017
Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:45:16 +0200
Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> Am 28.08.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> > These are your non-default lines:
> >
> > server signing = mandatory
>
> and i bet that one has the major performance impact
> __________________________
>
> quote from microsoft:
>
> Using SMB packet signing can degrade performance up to 15 percent on
> file service transactions.
>
> Depending on your network and your storage system implementation, the
> performance impact might be quite different. You may have to test in
> you own environment to get an accurate statistics.
>
Interesting. It's quite possible for the Samba implementation to be much
slower than Microsoft's. However of course if this turns on encryption
it can understandably hamper performance dramatically on fast networks.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac at intellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Signature digitale OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20170829/fcf1cb4f/attachment.sig>
More information about the samba
mailing list