[Samba] Friendly Reminder: Would you please comment on my findings?

[awl1]

Hello Jeremy,

welcome back - I hope you had a great vacation :-) - and I indeed took 
summertime and this possibility into account in my previous mail two 
weeks ago, so I hope I was not too impatient...

Anyway, I'm happy that you're back and hope that - well relaxed and 
burning for action ;-) - you will be able to find some time soon to look 
into my findings so far, because IMHO the results are interesting and - 
while they have uncovered that the performance regression most likely is 
not directly a Samba issue, but rather an issue in Micorsoft's SMB2/3 
client - I still hope that you and the Samba team will be able to 
address this issue with Microsoft (much better than I would be able to 
as an individual without your background/backing) such that the whole 
SMB communitiy will take profit from properly addressing/fixing it... ;-)

So looking forward to hearing from you again - hopefully soon. And in 
case it might still stake some more time until you get to look into 
this, can you please give an idea about how long it will take (days/weeks)?

Many thanks & best regards
Andreas


Am 18.08.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Jeremy Allison via samba:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:51:55PM +0200, awl1 wrote:
>> Hello one more time,
>>
>> unfortunately, one more time, another two weeks have passed without
>> any reaction from neither Jeremy in person nor the Samba
>> team/community. I am quite a bit astonished, disappointed and
>> negatively surprised indeed: Did I do anything wrong when raising my
>> issue with you? Everybody else asking questions or raising issues on
>> this list seems to receive great advice, while I no longer get any
>> reactions at all...
> It's not you :-). You have to remember a lot of the most
> active posters have full time jobs working on Samba. That
> means that paying customers get the most attention. Doesn't
> mean that non-paying list members get ignored, but that
> you get support on a best-effort basis. You didn't get a
> reply from me for 2 weeks as I was on vacation (which I
> did mention on the list :-).
>