[Samba] Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction - yet ldap ssl = no is set
peljasz at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Sep 14 16:30:59 UTC 2016
nothing here is meant to be personal, but.. why so hasty?
Why such a rush?
On 14/09/16 16:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> Good point, but why not post it as your second version, but with ';' in
> front of the lines ?
just take a moment to read ... thoroughly
> It may be that it isn't a Samba problem, I have seen similar problems
> with selinux or apparmor denying access.
nope, in permissive mode
> He still hasn't said why he wants to run Samba twice on the same
> machine, or how he is trying to do this.
I also said:
".. At this moment only this one instance of Samba is
".. Well, two instances would be a solution, workaround to
another problem I ran into, more difficult to overcome. But
that is not the issue to which I seek help here..."
so again, at this moment only one instance.
I really think it should be easy to reproduce - just use
above directives, and to get warnings about dbwrap_watchers.tdb
use ldap backend to passdb, then no matter with ssl or
without - fails as in the thread subject:
non-standard bit in smb.conf:
root directory = /var/lib/samba-second
lock directory = /var/lib/samba-second
state directory = /var/lib/samba-second
cache directory = /var/lib/samba-second
private dir = /var/lib/samba-second/private
ncalrpc dir = /run/samba-second/ncalrpc
ntp signd socket directory = /var/lib/samba-second/ntp_signd
winbindd socket directory = /run/samba-second/winbindd-second
winbindd privileged socket directory =
pid directory = /run/samba-second
More information about the samba