[Samba] smbd to authenticate via pam modules
vl at samba.org
Thu Sep 8 17:48:46 UTC 2016
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:25:44PM +0200, David Komanek wrote:
> obey pam restrictions (G)
> When Samba 3.0 is configured to enable PAM support (i.e.
> --with-pam), this parameter will control whether or not Samba should
> obey PAM's account and session management directives.
> The default behavior is to use PAM for clear text
> authentication only and to ignore any account or session management.
> Note that Samba always ignores PAM for authentication in the
> case of encrypt passwords = yes. The reason is that PAM
> modules cannot support the challenge/response authentication mechanism
> needed in the presence of SMB password encryption.
This is for everything but password checks. We have removed "encrypt
passwords = no", so you can't do password checks against PAM anymore.
> So was it just 3.0 version-specific and Samba 4 discontinued this
> feature ? If so, what is the right way to authenticate against kerberos
> or other external service at the backend (so that the user does not need
> to issue a ticket in advance) ? I know there is a possibility to store
> passwords in local database, but its just a duplication of information
> and need for an extra orchestration in this case. Hopefuly there is some
> simple way to achieve that without doing this or using the AD overhead.
> I just spent whole day googling with no good solution at the end, so I
> am probaly missing some terminology to produce well formulated questions.
Kerberos is just the right thing to do. If you don't want AD, set up a
classic Samba domain with "domain logons = yes" and a normal join by
the member. The DC needs the NT hashes in smbpasswd or passdb.tdb
More information about the samba