[Samba] Workstation Logon Restrictions (Log On To) with samba 4 AD

Trenta sis trenta.sis at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 18:27:15 UTC 2016

hi andrew and james,

my configurations is made from aduc tools as you described but doesn't work
about andrew message about this issue, I understand that is an issue and is
not solved and any solutions is available... only workaround is disable log
on restrictions in aduc, then works, but without security...
additional information with samba 3 and nt domain was working perfect


2016-11-01 6:57 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>:

> On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 20:20 +0100, Trenta sis via samba wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After a migration from samba 3 nt domain to samba 4 AD we have
> > detected
> > that Workstation Logon Restrictions (Log On To) is not working
> > correctly,
> > with samba 3 was working perfect, but after migration we have
> > detected that
> > some resources are not available, for example roaming profiles, home
> > folders... we have tried to add as log on to workstations  samba
> > machine
> > (dc), machine that has roaming profiles, home folders.... but without
> > success only works if we disable all restrictions to log on to, but
> > then
> > for our environment is a security problem
> >
> > How can I solve?
> The implementation of the workstation logon restrictions has always
> been a bit of a hack in Windows domains, and so to in Samba.  In NTLM,
> it was enforced largely by the client-supplied and unverified
> 'workstation' in the NTLM packet.  The protections in the NETLOGON
> server are a bit stronger, but your issue is that the KDC is now
> issuing the ticket, and perhaps that isn't checking the optional
> 'workstation name' 'address' that is put in the krb5 request.
> The correct way to enforce a login restriction would be to deny the
> service ticket, but then we would have to tell which TGS-REQ packets
> were for desktop logon, and which were for other services on other
> hosts.
> All in all, this is very hard to on the DC.  The workstation itself
> would be better placed to enforce such a restriction as an ACL, but I
> don't know of a way to do that.
> Andrew Bartlett
> --
> Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
> Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
> Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/
> services/samba

More information about the samba mailing list