[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?

[mathias dufresne]

2016-07-28 10:29 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:

>
>
> Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny:
>
>> On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote:
>>
>>> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict
>>> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate
>>> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the
>>> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC.
>>> Cheers - Michael
>>>
>>
>> This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one
>> computer?
>>
>
> then you setup a virtual machine which many people do in general for every
> service
>

+1 :D

>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>