[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 28.07.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Rowland penny:
> On 28/07/16 07:43, Michael Adam wrote:
>> Exactly. And it is a recommendation for a better layout, not a strict
>> requirement. Reasons being that it is genrally better to separate
>> responsibilites, and that in this case, you have more control over the
>> fine-tunings of a file server if it is not at the same time an AD/DC.
>> Cheers - Michael
>
> This is all very well and good Michael, but what if you only have one
> computer?

then you setup a virtual machine which many people do in general for 
every service

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160728/84ece099/signature.sig>