[Samba] Why is Samba4 not recommended as a file server?

Thu Jul 28 08:28:39 UTC 2016

Am 28.07.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Mark Foley:
> Since you bring up that topic (Samba4 not recommended as a file server), I've been meaning to
> ask on this list for a while: Why?

what are you talking about?
"not using the DC" != "not using samba4"

> -----Original Message-----
>> To: samba at lists.samba.org
>> From: Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 22:13:43 +0100
>> Subject: Re: [Samba] sendmail getting domain\user as email userId
>>
>> Samba has been recommending not using the DC as a
>> fileserver

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160728/42eeee98/signature.sig>