[Samba] Does KB3161949 (netbios disabled on windows) affect samba4 as well?

Sangeeta Singh sangeeta.ss.singh at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 06:28:14 UTC 2016


Wouldn't Samba4 have the same issues? It must be using netbios when in
an NT domain.

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:06 AM, David Bear <dwbear75 at gmail.com> wrote:
> You should consider using the samba 4 code -- I don't think there is much
> help to be had with version 3.0 --
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Sangeeta Singh
> <sangeeta.ss.singh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry am new, so dont know if this is the right place to ask this
>> question.
>> Microsoft recently released a security update( KB 3161949) that
>> disables netbios connection outside the local subnet.
>>
>> I have been using Samba 3.0.28 and since the name resolution doesn't
>> happen after installing the patch, I cant connect to my shares
>> anymore.
>>
>> If someone is using Linux samba4, can you please let me know if it
>> affected samba when its a member in a Windows domain?
>>
>> It should since samba in that configuration would still use netbios
>> but I couldnt find any chatter regarding this online, which is a
>> little odd. There are posts from facing similar issue and dont know
>> which version they were using, if they were using Linux samba.
>>
>> S
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>
>
>
> --
> David Bear
> mobile: (602) 903-6476
>
>



More information about the samba mailing list