[Samba] Disjointness between samba and distros?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Feb 9 15:44:17 UTC 2016

Am 09.02.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Jeff Sadowski:
> Most major distros compile samba with out the ability to do AD DC (Ubutum,
> Fedora, Suse)
> Fedora's documentation since samba 4.0 has stated
> "We'll provide Samba AD DC functionality as soon as its support of MIT
> Kerberos KDC will be ready."
> This is even provided in 4.4.0rc1 build of samba for fedora 24(rawhide)
> I'd rather see a document that says something like so
> "Samba AD DC server compiled samba is incompatible with MIT Kerberos we'll
> provide a compatible one as soon as samba supports MIT Kerberos KDC."
> or something along those lines.
> It just seems that samba has been disjoiint on its capabilities vs what
> distros compile it for since 4.0 was released all that time ago.
> What is going on in the linux communities?

they included and supported MIT Kerberos long before Samba 4 did exist 
at all and unlikely change that for a single package

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160209/b459d49b/signature.sig>

More information about the samba mailing list