[Samba] File Create Mask - did something change since the update?

Viktor Trojanovic viktor at troja.ch
Mon Aug 22 15:25:16 UTC 2016


On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:25:11 +0200
> Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rowland,
> >
> > Thanks for finding this for me. I admit, I don't see how my issue is
> > connected to the described "traverse folder" right, so I am not
> > exactly clear on what I'm supposed to do now. Are you saying the bug
> > fix created a new bug that I'm affected by, or is my configuration
> > somehow flawed that it only worked while there was a bug? If it's the
> > latter, would you be able to point me to the potential flaw(s)?
> >
> > Viktor
>
>
> This is the header from the commitdiff:
>
> When "ignore system acls" is set, do not mess at all with POSIX ACLS,
> do not even calculate the would-be POSIX-ACL-based security descriptor
> (for performance reasons).
> Instead, just store a V3 blob with zero hash. This means that if we
> later read the ACL without ignoring system ACLs, the NT ACL shall be
> reset to the info derivable from the POSIX ACL.
>
> File ownership is still modified as it has bearing on disk quotas.
>
> BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
>
> I think this is being looked into
>
> Rowland
>
> --
>

I saw this header but quite frankly could not fully grasp its meaning. I
also read the full thread about xattr with Ralph Böhme and others from 4
days ago that seems connected but what they discuss does not seem 1:1
applicable in my case.

Since I'm really heavily impacted by the situation, can you maybe suggest a
workaround? Would it be proper if I just set mode masks for file and
directory creation (0660 and 0770) for the time being?

Viktor


More information about the samba mailing list