[Samba] Workstation Limited to NT1 Protocol
lingpanda101 at gmail.com
lingpanda101 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 20:01:36 UTC 2016
On 4/19/2016 3:41 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
> I tried disabling SMB1 and enabling SMB2/3 and after reboot, I can't
> connect to any of my Samba servers...so looks to definitely be a
> workstation issue.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Bill Baird <bill.baird at phoenixmi.com
> <mailto:bill.baird at phoenixmi.com>> wrote:
>
> Just saw that, as well.
>
> After running the commands to enable SMB2 & SMB3 and
> rebooting...no luck. Will keep searching for other registry settings.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:27 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com
> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com
> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 4/19/2016 3:24 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
>> When I search for "smb2", I get nothing in my log file for
>> the NT1 limited system. If it is a workstation issue, that
>> would be great. I'll search around for what settings to
>> change. Maybe SMB2 was inadvertently disabled.
>>
>> Thanks for all of your help on this!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:20 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/2016 3:11 PM, Bill Baird wrote:
>>
>> [2016/04/19 15:04:46.352217, 10, pid=21600,
>> effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
>> ../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3068(smbd_smb2_first_negprot)
>> smbd_smb2_first_negprot: packet length 102
>>
>> Everything looks OK on your MS. Since it's only one
>> workstation I'm certain it's the issue. You want to look
>> for this line in your logs. This is what you posted from
>> your SMB2 connection.
>>
>> [2016/04/19 15:04:46.352217, 10, pid=21600, effective(0,
>> 0), real(0, 0)]
>> ../source3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3068(smbd_smb2_first_negprot)
>> smbd_smb2_first_negprot: packet length 102
>>
>> Specifically this 'smbd_smb2_first_negprot'. The
>> workstation should attempt SMB2 and fall back if it
>> can't. Do you even see this process?
>>
>> You can also force SMB2 in the registry of the windows
>> workstation if need be. I wouldn't advise it but it can
>> be done.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Bill Baird*
>> Chief Technology Officer
>> Office: 845-876-8228 x311 <tel:845-876-8228%20x311>
>> Mobile: 203-545-0437 <tel:203-545-0437>
>> www.phoenixmi.com <http://www.phoenixmi.com/>
>>
> Look here if you want to force SMB2 on the windows side.
>
> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547
>
> --
> -James
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Bill Baird*
> Chief Technology Officer
> Office: 845-876-8228 x311 <tel:845-876-8228%20x311>
> Mobile: 203-545-0437 <tel:203-545-0437>
> www.phoenixmi.com <http://www.phoenixmi.com/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Bill Baird*
> Chief Technology Officer
> Office: 845-876-8228 x311
> Mobile: 203-545-0437
> www.phoenixmi.com <http://www.phoenixmi.com/>
>
Can you use Wireshark to see the negotiation phase from the windows
workstation? Maybe a re-image of the Windows workstation if it's not
mission critical?
--
-James
More information about the samba
mailing list