[Samba] [PATCH] Re: Samba 4.1.17 classic update w/LDAP - parsing error
L.P.H. van Belle
belle at bazuin.nl
Thu Sep 24 10:49:49 UTC 2015
For debian, post a bug on bugs.debian.org and put the patch with it,
the debian devs will apply it to the debian release.
If you apply outside debian, you may loot you patch when a new debian samba is release.
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mgr. Peter
> Verzonden: donderdag 24 september 2015 10:46
> Aan: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> CC: Samba
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] [PATCH] Re: Samba 4.1.17 classic update w/LDAP -
> parsing error
> Hi all,
> thank You for Your answers and the help.
> 1, I have never applied a patch to Samba in Debian. Please, is there any
> howto or documentation?
> 2, If the patch worked for the import, would it be possible to revert to
> a distributional (unpatched) Samba afterwards?
> 3, We don't use any of the mentioned symbols in group names, just . and -
> 4, Unfortunately, we have a . in the NT4 (netbios) domain name. We
> already have issues with that, but only in Windows 8. Could this be the
> reason of the import error? I doubt that though because other import
> steps finished flawlessly, including netbios name registration during
> import process.
> 5, (Might be OT, depending on previous answer): If needed in order to
> resolve the problem, is it possible to simply and without consequences
> change the domain (netbios) name in LDAP, providing that SID would
> remain untouched and change in smb.conf would reflect the new name? Or
> the Windows clients use both the netbios name and SID in order to access
> their domain and they would drop off domain?
> D??a 24.09.2015 o 09:57 Andrew Bartlett napísal(a):
> > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 09:12 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> On 23 Sep 2015 9:47 PM, "Andrew Bartlett" <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 06:59 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >>>> That looks like a bug. My guess is that, as Roland suggested,
> >> the
> >>>> group name isn't just normal characters. We do support other
> >> chars
> >>>> in
> >>>> group names, but the bug here was not to escape the values. You
> >>>> could
> >>>> expect a particular problem with any of these in particular: =,()
> >>> Can you confirm this patch (against master, but should apply back
> >> to
> >>> 4.1) works for you?
> >>> If so, can I get a second team member to review/push?
> >> Does that still result in them being in CN=Users? Or is that not
> >> important?
> > Indeed, that is what I get for writing patches at 7 in the morning :-)
> > Try the attached. We really, really need some good expected-value
> > testing of the upgrade system.
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew Bartlett
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
More information about the samba