[Samba] Samba 3.6 doesn't accept force user / force group with domain name user
Jakov Sosic
jsosic at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 11:11:50 UTC 2015
Hi guys,
I had a samba 3.5.x install (CentOS 6), joined to an AD domain named
EXAMPLE. I also have a local user/group on a linux boxes example:example.
This is an example share:
[app]
path = /home/example/www/app
valid users = @"EXAMPLE\itdesign", @"EXAMPLE\itdev"
force user = "example"
force group = "example"
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
guest only = no
This works perfectly on 3.5.x.
BUT
After upgrading to 3.6.x, everything works EXCEPT that I cannot have
force user or force group set to 'example' in my smb.conf. Windows
clients report the following:
"The user name could not be found"
when I change 'force user' username to something else, I get:
"The group name could not be found".
So, basically, this is what I gotta do to make it work:
[app]
path = /home/example/www/app
valid users = @"EXAMPLE\itdesign", @"EXAMPLE\itdev"
force user = "someone"
force group = "else"
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
guest ok = no
guest only = no
And then it works...
Any ideas? Did Samba 3.6 disable the force user with the same name as
the domain? Is there an option that would allow this behaviour?
More information about the samba
mailing list