[Samba] invalid value 'netbios backup domain controller'

buhorojo buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 15:35:08 UTC 2015


On 12/10/15 17:07, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 12/10/15 15:50, buhorojo wrote:
>> On 12/10/15 15:52, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 12/10/15 14:39, buhorojo wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/15 14:52, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>> On 12/10/15 13:16, buhorojo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you are recommending lowering the clarity of samba 
>>>>>> configuration?. You wish to keep looking at the smb.conf which 
>>>>>> users post here guess that which they wish to achieve?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, what I saying is that adding 'server role' anywhere but on a 
>>>>> DC is causing problems. If 'server role' isn't added, the problems 
>>>>> don't appear, so the cure is simple, don't have it in the sample 
>>>>> smb.conf and beef up the comments on the smb.conf manpage to say 
>>>>> that you do not need to use 'server role' and to rely on the default.
>>>>> It is either that or get every samba howto on the internet 
>>>>> changed, are you volunteering to do that buhorojo?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Dunno. The vote here is to keep it. It would help people like you 
>>>> determine what type of server users who post to the list are 
>>>> talking about. And anyway, it says it's '[...] very important' to 
>>>> have it [...].
>>>>
>>>> Give up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well no, you are entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine, 
>>> but if it is 'very important to have it' , why are the only 
>>> complaints about it being in smb.conf. Nobody (as far as I am aware) 
>>> has every complained about messages in the logs saying 'server role' 
>>> not found.
>>>
>>> Rowland
>>>
>>>
>> What do you put in smb.conf for server role = if it is not a server?
>> We volunteer 'not a server'.
>> HTH
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh, now you are getting silly, go away little boy.
>
It was meant to help.
Any serious replies perhaps?




More information about the samba mailing list