[Samba] Questions About Bind_DLZ

David Minard david at scem.uws.edu.au
Mon Oct 12 02:25:54 UTC 2015


G'day Guys,

     Sorry for the delay.

     I've had the log level of samba at 5 for a while now.  Nothing 
interesting seems to be coming from the samba log.

     Increasing the bind logs, to level 5, shows nothing different. I 
get the same two warnings:

09-Oct-2015 12:46:01.421 database: warning: samba_dlz: Ignoring 
duplicate zone 'samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au' from 
'DC=@,DC=samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au'
09-Oct-2015 12:46:01.421 database: warning: samba_dlz: Ignoring 
duplicate zone '_msdcs.samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au' from 
'DC=@,DC=_msdcs.samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au'

Here is my named.conf file (Note: acls referencing IP Addresses for SCEM 
have been removed:

----------------------

acl "SCEM"    { KWD_Internal_Nets; PTA_Internal_Nets; CTN_Internal_Nets; 
KWD_Private_Labs_Nets; PTA_Private_Labs_Nets; KWD_Private_Staff_Nets; };

#acl "Server_ADM_Network" { server_adm; };

options {
     directory "/local/etc/named";
     allow-transfer { none; };
# Samba4
     tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab";
#
     notify yes;
     forward only;
     allow-query { SCEM; };
     allow-update { key samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au; };

     dnssec-validation no;
     auth-nxdomain no;        # conform to RFC1035

     forwarders {
         IP.Address.removed;        # KWD-SCEM - internal DNS
         IP.Address.removed;        # PTA-SCEM - internal DNS
         IP.Address.removed;        # CTN-SCEM - internal DNS
     };
};

logging{
   channel simple_log {
     file "/var/log/named.log" versions 3 size 5m;
     severity warning;
     print-time yes;
     print-severity yes;
     print-category yes;
   };
   category default{
     simple_log;
   };
};

# Master Zones


#  Samba4
     include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf";

----------------------------



> On 30/09/15 21:01, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> >/  Am 30.09.2015 um 03:50 schrieb David Minard:
> />>/  ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(objectClass=dnsZone)' -b
> />>/  'DC=SAMBA4,DC=SCEM,DC=WESTERNSYDNEY,DC=EDU,DC=AU' --cross-ncs name
> />>/
> />>/  # record 1
> />>/  dn:
> />>/  DC=samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
> />>/
> />>/  name: samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au
> />>/
> />>/  # record 2
> />>/  dn:
> />>/  DC=RootDNSServers,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
> />>/
> />>/  name: RootDNSServers
> />>/
> />>/  # record 3
> />>/  dn:
> />>/  DC=_msdcs.samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
> />>/
> />>/  name: _msdcs.samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au
> />>/
> />>/  # record 4
> />>/  dn:
> />>/  DC=RootDNSServers,CN=MicrosoftDNS,CN=System,DC=samba4,DC=scem,DC=westernsydney,DC=edu,DC=au
> />>/
> />>/  name: RootDNSServers
> />>/
> />>/  # returned 4 records
> />>/  # 4 entries
> />>/  # 0 referrals
> />/  Looks like it should.
> />/
> />/  Do the duplicate zone messages appear in the Samba or BIND logs?
> /
> The messages are coming from Samba, to be precise, from dlz_bind9.c
>
>               if (b9_zone_exists(state, zone)) {
>                   state->log(ISC_LOG_WARNING, "samba_dlz: Ignoring
> duplicate zone '%s' from '%s'",
>                          zone, ldb_dn_get_linearized(zone_dn));
>                   continue;
>               }
>
> >/
> />/  What log level are you using in smb.conf?
> /
> I wonder if the log level is turned up too high, I personally have never
> seen this message.
>
> I think it may help if the OP was to post the bind9 conf files and more
> of the logfile that contains the error, bits of a log can so easily be
> mis-understood.
>
> Rowland
> >/
> />/  Regards,
> />/  Marc
> />/
> /

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




More information about the samba mailing list