[Samba] Replication Failing - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT

Rowland Penny rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 1 08:26:12 UTC 2015


On 01/10/15 05:22, David Minard wrote:
> G'day Rowland,
>
>> On 29/09/15 15:30, David Minard wrote:
>>> I'm working on a brand new set of Samba DCs, as our University 
>>> changed it's domain name, so we thought we'd start from scratch.  
>>> Working on 4.2.3 at the moment.
>>>
>>> I finally got the new DC to join, but I had to wait until things got 
>>> quiet (midnight-ish).
>>>
>>>
>> Getting confused now, you originally posted this:
>>
>> I'm trying to commission another DC (number 5) in our production set up,
>> as we've opened up a new site.  All DCs are samba-4.0.25 self compiled.
>> Yet now you say you are setting up a new domain, which is it ?
>> If you are setting up a new domain, I hope you are not doing this in
>> production.
>
>     Sorry for the confusion.  I was just commenting to Marc that I am 
> also running up a new set of samba servers, as he suggested moving to 
> a supported version.    I'm loathed to jump up from this version to 
> the latest on the production system.  Next, year, I hope the newer DCs 
> I'm setting up with the new samba.domain will be in production, and 
> the current production set will be retired.
>
>     Our production version is 4.0.25, and this is the one with the 
> problem described in this thread.
>
>     I did end up getting samba4-05 to join, but even after a day or 
> so, it did not have any of the domain users, groups, computers - just 
> the standard stuff that comes with a new DC...  Strange.
>
>>
>> If you are setting up a new domain and self-compiling Samba, then you
>> might as well use the latest version, this should reduce your chances of
>> getting hit by a bug.
>
>     Working on that.
>
>>
>> Rowland
>>
>

I seem to remember that there was a problem with dns records and 
tombstones, have you tried searching for deleted dns records?

Rowland



More information about the samba mailing list