[Samba] idmap & migration to rfc2307

buhorojo buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com
Mon Nov 9 11:55:23 UTC 2015

On 09/11/15 12:19, Michael Adam wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 at 11:22 +0100, buhorojo wrote:
>> On 09/11/15 10:05, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 09/11/15 08:03, Michael Adam wrote:
>>>> On 2015-11-09 at 07:57 +0100, buhorojo wrote:
>>>>> On 08/11/15 23:40, Michael Adam wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-11-08 at 22:50 +0100, buhorojo wrote:
>>>>>>> On 08/11/15 21:01, Michael Adam wrote:
>>>>>>>> so sssd is not at all an option.
>>>>>>> No? What it does do is just work.
>>>>>> No. It does not work for the internals of the ad/dc.
>>>>>> It may work in nsswitch.
>>>>>> And did I mention this is neither a support
>>>>>> nor an advocating forum for sssd?
>>>>>>> winbind doesn't. It is unfair on the OP to insist it does.
>>>>>> What does "OP" mean?
>>>>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+does+OP+mean%3F
>>>> A-ha.
>>>> Btw: "Works-for-me" is a completely valid statement.
>>>> It is even a state in bugzilla. It simply means
>>>> "I do not have enough information about your
>>>> setup to reproduce your issue." It is not unfair
>>>> but encourages further exchange of information
>>>> until the problem is understood and can be addressed
>>>> or the OP's config is fixed.
>>>>>>>>> Currently it and nslcd are the only way to obtain full rfc2307
>>>>>>>>> and consistent ids on DCs. Neither winbind nor winbindd can do so.
>>>>>>>> Sure. winbindd can do it.
>>>>>>> Sorry but you are wrong. On a DC it can't.
>>>>>> If it does not fully work, then we need to fix that.
>>>>>> And as you so nicely pointed out earlier yourself
>>>>>> (for sssd in that case...), instead of recommending
>>>>>> the use of an unsupported external application,
>>>>>> please submit a bug report at https://bugzilla.samba.org/
>>>>> There are already many. Start with 10886.
>>>> Ah, thanks for the pointer.
>>>> We need to follow up on that.
>>> Let's be perfectly honest here, it was a mistake to not use the
>>> unixHomeDirectory & loginShell attributes from the very beginning of
>>> Samba4 and as such, this makes it the longest running bug of all!
>>> If it was fixed it would probably make Samba4 a good replacement for SBS.
>>> Rowland
>>>>> sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a
>>>>> fortune
>>>>> but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support.
>>>>> Or,
>>>>> build it yourslef even.
>>>> I am talking about "supported by Samba upstream",
>>>> not about "supported by a vendor or distribution".
>>>> Also, in case you are not aware:
>>>> The AD/DC setup of Samba is not (yet) supported
>>>> by RedHat or Fedora. You need a self-compiled
>>>> Samba for that. Not sure about the support level...
>>>> And if you have not noticed (even tough you have
>>>> been reminded before), this mailing list
>>>> is about Samba and its components, about helping
>>>> people to get the supported configurations working
>>>> and about improving Samba and its components.
>>>> So could you please stop sabotaging these efforts?
>> We are helping, not sabotaging.
> We? .... Is that you ... steves?
Eh? Plural. We work as a team. It works that way.

More information about the samba mailing list