[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
oflameo2 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 08:11:30 MST 2015
On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote:
>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote:
>>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I
>>>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit
>>>> ldbedt as root.
>>>> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific
>>>> meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from
>>>> doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem?
>>> Hmm, definitely going to need more info here, gidNumber has a specific
>>> meaning to samba, depending on how you set up samba.
>> I took the defaults except for rfc2307 which I enabled. I am running
>> Samba Version 4.1.11-Debian.
> Yes, but what as ?? an AD DC or in classic mode i.e. just like samba3
> Might be best if you post your smb.conf (sanitised )
I attached it to this email.
-------------- next part --------------
# Global parameters
workgroup = OFLAMEO
realm = D.OFLAMEO.COM
netbios name = DRAKEBURNER
server role = active directory domain controller
dns forwarder = 192.168.2.1
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/d.oflameo.com/scripts
read only = No
path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol
read only = No
More information about the samba