[Samba] Mandatory Server Signing with Windows 7

[Gaiseric Vandal]

I have not tried with a Samba 4.x DC. As far as I know Samba 4.x does 
not have this limitation.


On 01/06/15 04:10, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote:
>
> Does this mean that we cannot use mandatory server signing in Samba 3? 
>  What about the later versions? The problem is that lack of server 
> signing is considered a security hole.
>
>
> Inactive hide details for Gaiseric Vandal ---01/05/2015 05:52:53 
> PM---I am fairly certain you do not want server signing = mandGaiseric 
> Vandal ---01/05/2015 05:52:53 PM---I am fairly certain you do not want 
> server signing = mandatory https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Regi
>
> De : Gaiseric Vandal <gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com>
> A : samba at lists.samba.org,
> Date : 01/05/2015 05:52 PM
> Objet : Re: [Samba] Mandatory Server Signing with Windows 7
> Envoyé par : samba-bounces at lists.samba.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> I am fairly certain you do not want server signing = mandatory
>
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains
>
>
>
>
>
> On 01/05/15 11:31, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > When I enable server signing in Samba (server signing = mandatory), 
> I can
> > still join a Window 7 machine to the domain but I am no longer able 
> to log
> > on into the domain using a domain user. Is this normal? I am using Samba
> > 3.6.3 on Linux 12.04. Is there anything that needs to be configured 
> on the
> > Windows machine?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ali
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> ______________________________________________________________________
>