[Samba] Winbind backend : rid is too much underappreciated

[L.P.H. van Belle]

ah, ok, yes that was it..  ;-)  

so for my understanding. 

we use AD backend if we also want to use the RFC2307 extention (with winbind and schema_mode rfc2307) 
and we can use RID if we want the windows user id with winbind.

and for RID we can use the server templete settings 
and for AD can can set this per user seen the the Unix Attibutes tab in the windows tool

correct?  (I still done understand the main difference between AD and RID.) 

i just did read both man's but that does not make it more clear for me.


Greetz, 

Louis


>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com 
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
>Verzonden: dinsdag 24 februari 2015 12:14
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Winbind backend : rid is too much 
>underappreciated
>
>On 24/02/15 10:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>> didnt we have the problem with backend to RID,
>> that the user ID wasnt always the same on different member servers.
>> and to keep that in line you had to copy the idmap.db to the 
>other server?
>>
>> Or am i mixing up other things now.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Louis
>>
>
>Yes, you are mixing things up now :-D
>
>idmap.ldb is only found on DCs and hands out different numbers on each 
>DC, hence copying the idmap.ldb from the first DC to any subsequent DC.
>
>Rowland
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>