[Samba] Winbind backend : rid is too much underappreciated
rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 23 03:43:35 MST 2015
On 22/02/15 22:27, Miguel Medalha wrote
> Nope! I had 'uidNumber' & 'gidNumber' in AD.
> Well, maybe I should explain everything in a orderly way, which, being too
> tired, I hadn't the patience to do the other day.
> I had a AD DC running Samba 4.1.x for some time, doubling as a file server.
> Yes, I know it is not the recommended way, but sometimes real life leads
> us into particular situations. (It was a long-thought decision, but it
> would be boring to go through the details here.)
OK, I understand, even though it is not recommended, sometimes you just
have to do it :-)
> Then, two days ago I finally got another server and I wanted to join it to
> the domain as a member server. All went smoothly from that point of view.
> I then went to ADUC (Active Directory Users and Computers) and started to
> fill the 'UNIX Attributes' tab with 'uidNumber' & 'gidNumber'. I started
> with the Administrator account, accepting the proposed uid 10000 and so
> on. Then, bang, I couldn't connect with my user profile when logging in
> to the domain from the same Windows machine I always used.
By default, Administrator is given the 'xidNumber' 0 which is also the
id for the Unix user 'root', by changing this you made 'Administrator' a
normal Unix user with all the permissions (or rather lack of) this
entails. You probably needed to update the 'security' tab on the
> I had previously noticed that getent on the AD DC gave me ids in a range
> starting with 3000000, and I thought that this could be the reason why
> the Administrator account had lost access to essential folders on the
> server, since the default range and the range entered with ADUC didn't
> match. I then tried to give some users the same id in the 3000000 range
> reported by getent on the DC, except for Administrator, to which I gave
> id 0, as again reported by getent on the DC. Now, I could see all the
> users from the member server, except for Administrator and except again
> for 'getent group' unless I specified the group. I must add that 'wbinfo
> -u/-g' always showed me all users and groups, including Administrator.
wbinfo works directly on AD, getent goes via Unix. When you give the
Administrator user the id 0, getent will only return the first user it
finds, if you want the info for Administrator to be returned, change the
passwd line in /etc/nsswitch.conf to 'passwd winbind compat' (note,
this on debian, 'compat' may be 'files' on your distro)
NOTE: once you have finished testing, please put the line in
/etc/nsswitch.conf back to what it was, or you will not have a root user:-D
> (Yes, I have 'passwd: files winbind' 'and group: files winbind' in
> /etc/nsswitch.conf. And yes I changed the idmap config range to
> 3000000-4000000 in smb.conf for the experience I just described)
If, as you say, your users have a 'uidNumber' in the '3000000-4000000'
range *and* Domain Users has a 'gidNumber' in the same range, it should
> I tried to set permissions on a share from Windows, to which the reply was
> that I (Administrator) did not have the permissions to set or even view
> permissions. And yes, I had granted all the necessary rights to
> Administrator and Domain Admins.
This was possibly caused by a misunderstanding, Administrator on the DC
is mapped to 'root' so has all the permissions of 'root' i.e. it can do
anything. On a member server it is different, you have to explicitly map
> After a lot of trials including username mapping and so on, I decided to
> try the rid backend, which worked immediately.
Yes, it is a lot easier, but only if you do not require to set home dirs
& shells per user.
> I am probably commiting some basic mistake that is ridiculous from the
> developers' point of view. I am not a developer and my knowledge of the
> inner workings of Samba is limited, although I have been using it
> successfully for more than 10 years with file servers and NT4-style
> domain controllers. I just feel that simply following the instructions on
> the Wiki is not enough to painlessly configure a member server.
I am not a developer either but I do have permission to change the wiki
, so if you struggled with the wiki, is there any chance you could tell
us what you feel is wrong or missing from the member-server page, unless
we get feedback we do not really know that it needs to be updated.
> Maybe some unfortunate decisions have been made through the development of
> the Samba AD DC regarding winbind and id mapping that led to confusing
> users. Please note that I am not bitching or even complaining. I admire
> the work of the Samba team and I grateful for it. But maybe real life and
> real problems led to some decisions that were not the easiest for users.
> Than you for you patience
> As an aside, username mapping does not seem to be working in the usual way,
> as described in the man page. If I entered more than one name after the
> '=' sign, mapping stopped working. For example:
> 'root = Administrator' did map root to administrator, getent showed me
> 'root = Administrator admin' did not work, getent ceased to show
> The use of !root as described in the manual also caused getent not to show
All I can say here is that it works for me.
More information about the samba