[Samba] Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ

[L.P.H. van Belle]

when you know the name of a file.. its not so hard to search for it. 
I for example install mlocate.. type updatedb 
and `locate named.conf | grep samba` , voila your file and location. 

Greetz, 


>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Seymour
>Verzonden: vrijdag 28 augustus 2015 02:25
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
>
>On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:23:57 -0400
>Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>> 
>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
>[snip]
>> > If you're already having BIND running, you're just one step away
>> > from including the AD DNS domain as additional domain via DLZ.
>> > 
>https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_
>Samba_AD#BIND_9.8_.2F_9.9
>> >
>> > What's wrong with that?
>> 
>> It says:
>> 
>> include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf";
>> 
>> This file does not exist on my sernet 4.2 installation.
>> 
>> In fact, I do not have a /usr/local/samba directory.
>
>It's an unfortunate fact of life that different Linux distros tend to
>put stuff in different places.  Whenever documentation from the
>original/source project maintainer(s) refers to "/usr/local/...", you
>can be assured they're talking about if you build and install their
>package from the source tarball and that Linux distro people will put
>stuff Somewhere Else, often a wildly different Somewhere Else.
>
>samba_upgradedns told me where it would be, in my case.
>
>Regards,
>Jim
>-- 
>Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
>filtering.  If you reply to this email and your email is
>rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
>web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>