[Samba] sssd-ad cannot be installed with sernet samba

[Rowland Penny]

On 02/04/15 11:37, buhorojo wrote:
> On 02/04/15 12:19, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 02/04/15 11:05, buhorojo wrote:
>>> On 02/04/15 11:27, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>> On 02/04/15 10:20, buhorojo wrote:
>>>>> On 02/04/15 08:36, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>>>>>> nss/winbind does work, yes, there is 1 missing file, just created 
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>> ( and this is not needed on a DC ! )
>>>>> So you are telling us that something that returns:
>>>>> /bin/false
>>>>>  when:
>>>>> /bin/bash
>>>>> is specified in the database is a piece of software that is working?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You only need a shell if you are logging into the DC and you 
>>>> shouldn't be, the samba wiki couldn't be much plainer, it is not 
>>>> recommended to use the DC as a fileserver!
>>>>
>>>> However, if you must use the DC as a fileserver, investigate the 
>>>> 'template' lines for smb.conf
>>>>
>>>> Rowland
>>>
>>> The correct output from getent and id goes far beyond login! Please 
>>> read previous the posts to the list.
>>>
>>
>> If you follow the recommendation on the samba wiki and do not use the 
>> DC as a fileserver, you will not have this problem. Using the 
>> 'template' lines is a workaround, but you still could have problems 
>> if you do use the DC as a fileserver.
>>
>> Rowland
>
> No, that doesn't help. Forget file-servers and DCs. How else can we 
> explain that the output from e.g. getent is wrong? We need the output 
> of getent to be correct. So we must use sssd. sssd-ad does not work 
> with sernet. There is no fix for that. That's it. Done!
>
>

WHERE is the output from getent wrong ?
On a DC ?
On a Linux member server ?
On a Linux client ?

What is wrong ?

It is no good just saying getent is wrong, please give examples of what 
is wrong, if there is a definite bug, a bug report can be raised and it 
should get fixed, but as far as I am aware, Samba using windbind works 
as described on the wiki.

Rowland