[Samba] 4.1.11/DebianWheezyBackports vs. 4.1.12/Sernet

L.P.H. van Belle belle at bazuin.nl
Thu Oct 23 00:42:03 MDT 2014

as extra comment, 

If we find "misconfigured" dependecies, just report them to sernet support.
They wil fix them. 


>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: dajhorn at vanadac.com 
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Darik Horn
>Verzonden: woensdag 22 oktober 2014 19:59
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] 4.1.11/DebianWheezyBackports vs. 4.1.12/Sernet
>On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Harry Jede <walk2sun at arcor.de> wrote:
>> The packages from sernet are surly newer, but they have a big show
>> stopper. These packages do not flag themselve as "samba" or 
>> or any other package name used by Debian.
>> So what happens, if one ever installed a Debian package 
>which depends on
>> samba or smbclient? The Debian packages get installed and one ends up
>> with two packages in different versions.
>Try using the `equivs` utility to create dummy "samba" and "smbclient"
>packages for Sernet installations.
>Darik Horn <dajhorn at vanadac.com>
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

More information about the samba mailing list