[Samba] ntvfs handler = cifs, CIFS-Proxy
steve at steve-ss.com
Sat Oct 4 12:01:23 MDT 2014
On 04/10/14 11:20, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 04/10/14 09:37, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 19:04 +0200, Meike Stone wrote:
>>> 2014-10-01 17:22 GMT+02:00 Meike Stone <meike.stone at googlemail.com>:
>>>> I'm trying to configure a CIFS-Proxy. My configuration is:
>>>> workgroup = MYDOM
>>>> server role = member server
>>>> realm = MYDOM.NET
>>>> netbios name = FS01
>>>> server services = +smb +s3fs
>>>> dcerpc endpoint servers = +winreg +srvsvc
>>> sorry, I used
>>> server services = +smb -s3fs
>>>> ntvfs handler = cifs
>>>> cifs:server = 192.168.1.10
>>>> cifs:share = projects$
>>>> but in logfile I ever get following message:
>>>> [2014/10/01 17:04:05.929403, 0]
>>>> WARNING: No path in service test - making it unavailable!
>>>> [2014/10/01 17:04:06.146723, 0]
>>>> It is samba 4.1.12, the packages are from Sernet.
>>>> Do I need to compile my binaries on my own, if so,
>>>> what compiling options I must use?
>>> or is there any mistake, can I debug this problem?
>> So, what is happening here is that some of our common code in loadparm
>> really isn't ready to cope with the idea of a path-less share, and the
>> quickest way to shut it up is to define a path, but know that won't be
>> used by the ntvfs file server.
>> It won't actually stop the cifs proxy working. We know the proxy works
>> (for SMB1) because we test it in make test.
>> I know you got down a rabbit-hole with Roland, but yes, this really is a
>> feature, it is hard to find and use, because you need to operate Samba
>> in a way not documented clearly (because for everyone else, it is
>> useless) where you use the 'samba-tool domain provision
>> --server-role=member' mode followed by 'samba-tool domain join' if you
>> need to be part of a domain.
> OK Andrew, just who has heard of provisioning a samba4 server and
> **then* *joining it to the domain ??
> Also 'not documented clearly', rubbish, it is **not* *documented at all,
> so seeing has how you seem to understand this, how about writing a howto?
> I was trying to find out just what he had done, it was not clear whether
> he had provisioned or joined, but anyway, it seems he needs to do both!
Phew, this is difficult to translate. So what's the answer to the OP's
question? Is it, yes, he does have to compile his own code? Or no, the
sernet binaries are fine.
For everyone else, can we read, make install and then net ads join? Like
we've done for centuries?
More information about the samba