[Samba] Bind Samba4 services on different IPs?

[Chan Min Wai]

Hi Gerg,

If you are using bind. I believed that you will not have such a hit. 

As bind are design for that kind of load.

Samba using bind DLZ module to make dynamic change in content without restart bind possible. So basically it is still a static files from bind point of view samba only update and reload whenever there are changes. 

Hope that help to explain. 


Regards, 
Chan Min Wai 

> Greg Zartman <gzartman at koozali.org> 於 4 Nov 2014 4:07 PG 寫道：
> 
> it's honestly not me.  I'm sharing my work with other developers on the SME
> Server team and some are having a hard time of letting go of our current
> configuration, so I'm having to defend what I'm doing, which is basically
> the suggestions you and others have made.   Some on the team are asking why
> we can't keep dnscache in front of Samba4 DNS and I'm saying it can't be
> done.  They are worried Samba's DNS can't stand up to heavy DNS traffic and
> will fall over.
> 
> My setup right now looks like this and it seems to be working fine;
> 
> [root at testbed service]# netstat -plunt | grep :53
> tcp        0      0 127.0.0.2:53                0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN      17485/dnscache
> tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:53                0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN      17479/samba
> tcp        0      0 192.168.0.67:53             0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN      17479/samba
> udp        0      0 127.0.0.2:53                0.0.0.0:*
>            17485/dnscache
> udp        0      0 127.0.0.1:53                0.0.0.0:*
>            17479/samba
> udp        0      0 192.168.0.67:53             0.0.0.0:*
>            17479/samba
> 
> 
> I was just trying to cover my bases.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> On 03/11/14 19:09, Greg Zartman wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can you bind the various samba services on different IPs?
>>> 
>>> For example:  Bind the DNS on 127.0.0.2 and everything else on
>>> 127.0.0.1/LAN
>>> IP?
>>> 
>>> Seems to me that the interfaces command is all or nothing.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Greg
>> Hi Greg, why are you trying to make things hard for yourself ? I suppose
>> that it might just be possible, but why bother, it is something else to go
>> wrong and you will be running samba4 in a way that is different to everyone
>> else.
>> 
>> You need to stop thinking in terms of samba3 and make SME work with samba4
>> and not the other way round.
>> 
>> Can I suggest that you look at how the "opposition" works, Zentyal.
>> 
>> Rowland
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg J. Zartman
> Board Member
> 
> Koozali Foundation, Inc.
> 2755 19th Street SE
> Salem, Oregon 97302
> Cell:  541-5218449
> 
> SME Server user and community member since 2000
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba