[Samba] SysVol questions
jra at samba.org
Thu May 22 11:13:47 MDT 2014
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:11:25AM -0500, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
> That may be the case but samba 4.x has a long way to before it will
> replace a samba 3.6.x file server. The AD part of samba 4 is cool
> and I have been playing with it for many years but it has a serious
> AD replication problem and the smb server performance is VERY bad.
It's the same smbd file server code as 3.6.x (just with more
features, fixes and performance changes :-). So I don't know
where you're getting the Samba 4.x is "different" idea from :-).
More information about the samba