[Samba] winbind bug?

[Doug Tucker]

For the record, that's actually the way I had it at first.  All 
different ranges.  But I can't find any documentation to support that, 
and someone who replied to my original thread sent me his conf file and 
he uses the same range for everything.  Which is frankly what prompted 
me to change mine to reflect what he had.  The bottom line though, is 
neither way does it affect any working users, nor does it make it better 
for users with unix id's over 11000.

Sincerely,

Doug Tucker

On 03/27/2014 10:17 AM, Chan Min Wai wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> From my understand
>
> You cannot have any duplication idmap range.
> Each AD will need a different range
> the * --> Other also need to be in different range.
>
> And I believes that is the reason why winbind follow the number strictly.
> So you don't overlap any idmap number and confuse the samba server.
>
>
> What happen if you have 2 AD DC with the same idmap range...
>
> I believes that you will have to change either one.
>
> Hope this help.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Doug Tucker <tuckerd at lyle.smu.edu 
> <mailto:tuckerd at lyle.smu.edu>> wrote:
>
>     The way I understand that it's totally arbitrary.  As long as the
>     unix id and AD sid are unique (which they have to be) the idmap is
>     always going to be unique as well. And keep in mind, 95% of my
>     users unix id is under 11000, and everything works for them.  The
>     unix id being > 11000 for some reason is THE reason for my issue.
>
>     Sincerely,
>
>     Doug Tucker
>
>
>     On 03/27/2014 09:40 AM, Shane Robinson wrote:
>
>
>         Am I wrong thinking the overlapping idmap ranges are (part of)
>         the problem?
>
>
>         Shane Robinson
>
>
>         Sent from phone.
>         Please excuse my brevity.
>
>
>     -- 
>     To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>     instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>