[Samba] BUG:? testparm samba-tool testparm ? ( sernet-samba )

[Chan Min Wai]

Yes


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:21 PM, steve <steve at steve-ss.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 11:29 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> > Still this should be reported as a bug.  ( so here it is. )
> > You cant have 2 different outputs about the config your running.
> > Very confusion and simply wrong imho.
> >
> > Up to the dev's to judge on this.
> >
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >
> > >> i only did check and i found it..
> > >>
> > >> testparm -v | grep sig
> > >>          ntp signd socket directory =
> > >>
> > >> samba-tool testparm --verbose | grep sig
> > >>
> > >>          ntp signd socket directory = /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd
> > >>
> > >> so 2 tools to test parameters with different outcome.
> >
> >
> >
> > >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
> > >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
> > >Verzonden: donderdag 27 maart 2014 11:05
> > >CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> > >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] easy - automated setup : Debian Wheezy
> > >with sernet samba 4.1
> > >
> > >On 27/03/14 07:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> > >> Good one.
> > >>
> > >> i only did check and i found it..
> > >>
> > >> testparm -v | grep sig
> > >>          ntp signd socket directory =
> > >>
> > >> samba-tool testparm --verbose | grep sig
> > >>
> > >>          ntp signd socket directory = /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd
> > >>
> > >> so 2 tools to test parameters with different outcome.
> > >>
> > >> Is this by design and if so why? anyone?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > >>> Van: Rowland Penny [mailto:rowlandpenny at googlemail.com]
> > >>> Verzonden: woensdag 26 maart 2014 19:39
> > >>> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> > >>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] easy - automated setup : Debian Wheezy
> > >>> with sernet samba 4.1
> > >>>
> > >>> On 26/03/14 16:00, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> > >>>> Hai,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Im setting up scripted samba4 installs to make things more
> > >>> uniform installations.
> > >>>> It saves time, and errors, and it will be easier to trace bugs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is the first one and more are comming.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> How does it work and what do you need and what do you get
> > >in the end.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What you get.
> > >>>> Debian wheezy, with sernet samba4.1
> > >>>> - server setup as AD-DC  ( the first server with samba4 )
> > >>>> - Bind9_dlz is used and reverse zone is auto created.
> > >>>> - NTP server setup.
> > >>>> - kerberos test scripted same as the hostname tests.
> > >>>> - info is in the script, what to put where.
> > >>>> - needed rights are fixed, where incorrect was found.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Howto
> > >>>> 1) install a clean debian wheezy, only ssh, more is
> > >>> possible, but i tested with a very clean server.
> > >>>> 2) get it :
> > >>>> wget  --no-check-certificate
> > >>> https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setu
> > >>> p.sh && chmod +x debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh &&
> > >>> ./debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh
> > >>>> 3) configure it   : nano debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh
> > >>>> 4) run it.   ./debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ToDo.
> > >>>> In the next release of the script, it wil be Debian and
> > >>> Ubuntu compatible.
> > >>>> And i'll build in a choose which samba you want to install.
> > >>>> For example.
> > >>>> Debian + samba from backports
> > >>>> Debian + samba from sernet
> > >>>> Debian + samba from Debian
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ubuntu + samba from sernet  ( should work now already, but
> > >>> not tested. )
> > >>>>    ** you need to change the script a bit for this. Lines 210
> > >>> + 212 and 213
> > >>>>       change debian to ubuntu   and wheezy to precise
> > >>>>        ** other ubuntu should work also but just try it and
> > >>> report it back please.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So try it and report back to me if you have suggestions.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Greetz,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Louis
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> Hi Louis, just glanced through your script and one part
> > >caught my eye:
> > >>>
> > >>> # set the ntp_signed path in samba ( default is empty )
> > >>> ## hardcoded for now, need to look in to pass variable to sed
> > >>> sed -i '8a\\n        ntp signd socket directory =
> > >>> /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd\n' /etc/samba/smb.conf
> > >>>
> > >>> Have you ever run 'samba-tool testparm --verbose' ???? ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> Of course, it doesn't help having two testparms, I do wish that they
> > >>> would roll them into one.
> > >>>
> > >>> Rowland
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >I think that the idea is you use 'testparm' if you are running
> > >samba in
> > >'classic' mode and 'samba-tool testparm' in 'dc' mode. Only problem is
> > >that it confuses people, somebody a lot brighter than me, needs to
> > >combine the two, probably under samba-tool and with a switch i.e
> > >'samba-tool testparm classic' or 'samba-tool testparm dc'.
> > >
> > >Rowland
> > >
> > >--
> > >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > >instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> Ahhgghh. Talk about cat amongst. . .
> Can you give me a yes or on these?
> 4.1.4 DC:
> samba-tool testparm
>
> 4.1.4 file-server:
> testparm
>
> 4.1.4 client:
> testparm
>
> Urgent.
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>