[Samba] BUG:? testparm samba-tool testparm ? ( sernet-samba )

[steve]

On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 11:29 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Still this should be reported as a bug.  ( so here it is. ) 
> You cant have 2 different outputs about the config your running. 
> Very confusion and simply wrong imho. 
> 
> Up to the dev's to judge on this. 
> 
> 
> Louis
> 
> 
> 
> >> i only did check and i found it..
> >>
> >> testparm -v | grep sig
> >>          ntp signd socket directory =
> >>
> >> samba-tool testparm --verbose | grep sig
> >>
> >>          ntp signd socket directory = /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd
> >>
> >> so 2 tools to test parameters with different outcome.
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com 
> >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
> >Verzonden: donderdag 27 maart 2014 11:05
> >CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] easy - automated setup : Debian Wheezy 
> >with sernet samba 4.1
> >
> >On 27/03/14 07:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> >> Good one.
> >>
> >> i only did check and i found it..
> >>
> >> testparm -v | grep sig
> >>          ntp signd socket directory =
> >>
> >> samba-tool testparm --verbose | grep sig
> >>
> >>          ntp signd socket directory = /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd
> >>
> >> so 2 tools to test parameters with different outcome.
> >>
> >> Is this by design and if so why? anyone?
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >>> Van: Rowland Penny [mailto:rowlandpenny at googlemail.com]
> >>> Verzonden: woensdag 26 maart 2014 19:39
> >>> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> >>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] easy - automated setup : Debian Wheezy
> >>> with sernet samba 4.1
> >>>
> >>> On 26/03/14 16:00, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> >>>> Hai,
> >>>>    
> >>>> Im setting up scripted samba4 installs to make things more
> >>> uniform installations.
> >>>> It saves time, and errors, and it will be easier to trace bugs.
> >>>>    
> >>>> This is the first one and more are comming.
> >>>>    
> >>>>    
> >>>> How does it work and what do you need and what do you get 
> >in the end.
> >>>>    
> >>>> What you get.
> >>>> Debian wheezy, with sernet samba4.1
> >>>> - server setup as AD-DC  ( the first server with samba4 )
> >>>> - Bind9_dlz is used and reverse zone is auto created.
> >>>> - NTP server setup.
> >>>> - kerberos test scripted same as the hostname tests.
> >>>> - info is in the script, what to put where.
> >>>> - needed rights are fixed, where incorrect was found.
> >>>>    
> >>>>    
> >>>> Howto
> >>>> 1) install a clean debian wheezy, only ssh, more is
> >>> possible, but i tested with a very clean server.
> >>>> 2) get it :
> >>>> wget  --no-check-certificate
> >>> https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setu
> >>> p.sh && chmod +x debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh &&
> >>> ./debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh
> >>>> 3) configure it   : nano debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh
> >>>> 4) run it.   ./debianWheezy-sernetSamba4-setup.sh
> >>>>    
> >>>> ToDo.
> >>>> In the next release of the script, it wil be Debian and
> >>> Ubuntu compatible.
> >>>> And i'll build in a choose which samba you want to install.
> >>>> For example.
> >>>> Debian + samba from backports
> >>>> Debian + samba from sernet
> >>>> Debian + samba from Debian
> >>>>    
> >>>> Ubuntu + samba from sernet  ( should work now already, but
> >>> not tested. )
> >>>>    ** you need to change the script a bit for this. Lines 210
> >>> + 212 and 213
> >>>>       change debian to ubuntu   and wheezy to precise
> >>>>        ** other ubuntu should work also but just try it and
> >>> report it back please.
> >>>>    
> >>>> So try it and report back to me if you have suggestions.
> >>>>    
> >>>>    
> >>>> Greetz,
> >>>>    
> >>>> Louis
> >>>>    
> >>>>    
> >>>>
> >>> Hi Louis, just glanced through your script and one part 
> >caught my eye:
> >>>
> >>> # set the ntp_signed path in samba ( default is empty )
> >>> ## hardcoded for now, need to look in to pass variable to sed
> >>> sed -i '8a\\n        ntp signd socket directory =
> >>> /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd\n' /etc/samba/smb.conf
> >>>
> >>> Have you ever run 'samba-tool testparm --verbose' ???? ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Of course, it doesn't help having two testparms, I do wish that they
> >>> would roll them into one.
> >>>
> >>> Rowland
> >>>
> >>>
> >I think that the idea is you use 'testparm' if you are running 
> >samba in 
> >'classic' mode and 'samba-tool testparm' in 'dc' mode. Only problem is 
> >that it confuses people, somebody a lot brighter than me, needs to 
> >combine the two, probably under samba-tool and with a switch i.e 
> >'samba-tool testparm classic' or 'samba-tool testparm dc'.
> >
> >Rowland
> >
> >-- 
> >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> >instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> >
> >
> 

Ahhgghh. Talk about cat amongst. . .
Can you give me a yes or on these?
4.1.4 DC:
samba-tool testparm

4.1.4 file-server:
testparm

4.1.4 client:
testparm

Urgent.
Cheers,
Steve