[Samba] Upgrading from Samba 4.0.1 to 4.1.6

[Jason Waters]

When I put the right information, this is the error I get

ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741643, 'NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT')
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
line 175, in _run
    return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py",
line 984, in run
    dns_conn = dns_connect(server, self.lp, self.creds)
  File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py",
line 37, in dns_connect
    dns_conn = dnsserver.dnsserver(binding_str, lp, creds)



On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Jason Waters <jwaters at h2os.com> wrote:

> I see why I got that error.  I needed to put the server and the domain.
>  my bad!  Still acting slow though.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Jason Waters <jwaters at h2os.com> wrote:
>
>> root at fspa:~# kinit administrator
>> kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'ABC.LOCAL' while getting initial
>> credentials
>> root at fspa:~# samba-tool dns query SERVER DOMAIN @ ALL
>> ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741772,
>> 'NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND')
>>   File
>> "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
>> line 175, in _run
>>     return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
>>   File
>> "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py", line
>> 984, in run
>>     dns_conn = dns_connect(server, self.lp, self.creds)
>>   File
>> "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py", line
>> 37, in dns_connect
>>     dns_conn = dnsserver.dnsserver(binding_str, lp, creds)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Jason Waters <jwaters at h2os.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I seem to be having a DNS issue.  The DNS server is really really slow
>>> when I use samba.  Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> root at fspa:~# ping google.com
>>> PING google.com (204.186.215.54) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=1 ttl=61 time=13.7 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=2 ttl=61 time=11.1 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=3 ttl=61 time=10.9 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=4 ttl=61 time=13.8 ms
>>> ^C64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=5 ttl=61 time=13.1 ms
>>>
>>> --- google.com ping statistics ---
>>> 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 20179ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10.907/12.562/13.896/1.284 ms
>>>
>>>
>>> See the 20179ms???
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jason Waters <jwaters at h2os.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marc,
>>>>   Sorry about just grepping the error.  Didn't know if that would flag
>>>> anything that you "knew" already.  Like the .pem issue before.  I figured
>>>> out the problem.  In smb.conf I had [print$] defined with a directory that
>>>> didn't exist.  As soon as I created it samba would start and stay running!
>>>>  Thank you for the help.  Also sorry about my calling it PDC/BDC.  I will
>>>> refer to them as domain controllers from now on! :)
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <
>>>> samba at marc-muehlfeld.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.03.2014 02:32, schrieb Jason Waters:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Got a little further.  I removed the pem files and then the one(PDC)
>>>>>> started and stayed working.  The BDC did not.  I got this when I grep
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> log file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> root at fsZZ:/usr/local/samba-4.1.6/var# grep error log.samba
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please empty your logs, start samba and then have a look at _all_ the
>>>>> messages are shown. Only with the lines containing the word "error" in
>>>>> lower cases it would be very hard to help.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean with "one(PDC) started and stayed working. The BDC
>>>>> did not." What is not working? Are all processes running? If not, which is
>>>>> missing? It Samba listening on all ports it should? If not, which ports are
>>>>> not listening? ....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw: You said you have a Samba AD, then you don't have PDC/BDCs. You
>>>>> have Domain Controllers. Please use this term, as PDC/BDC indicate that
>>>>> you're running a NT4-style domain. This confuses, as for a Samba4 NT4-style
>>>>> domain you have to do different steps than for an AD DC.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Marc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>